• NME.COM
  • Saturday, 10 January 2009

NME Reviews

Girls Aloud

Out Of Control

With a rock’n’roll album climate where five decent-ish tracks and five unfinished B-side attempts means a knighthood, things like guitars, moshpits and artists writing their own material seem increasingly superfluous when in search of that rare beast, a proper song. ‘The Show’, ‘Something Kinda Ooooh’, ‘Sexy! No No No…’ and of course, last year’s best single (sorry, ‘Golden Skans’!), ‘Call The Shots’. It’s a read ’em and weep situation.

The enslaving combination of Xenomania’s production house – the UK charts’ answer to Sauron from The Lord Of The Rings – and five inexplicably likeable tabloid linchpins has ruled the British hit parade with an iron heel since they won Popstars: The Rivals in 2002. Album – you’re actually not going to believe this – five has Xeno mainman Brian Higgins’ gratuitous gorging of styles and tightly bound swathes of sound firmly in place. ‘Love Is The Key’ is a perversely busy beast, Gregorian choirs paving the way for hoedown guitars fused to groaning electro keys. ‘Call The Shots 2’ – aka ‘The Loving Kind’ – proves to be a letdown sequel. Their link-up with the Pet Shop Boys is soap-strings, hi-NRG pumps and wistful wails, with a damp towel of a chorus.

It’s the cutesy Abba-esque mum-dancing of ‘Rolling Back The Rivers’ and the sky-scraping invisibility of ‘Untouchable’’s post-Ibiza power-balladeering, though, that really flexes their superhuman pop muscles. Not their best, but still more consistent than any British indie album released this year.

Jaimie Hodgson

8 out of 10

Comments (37)

Add a comment

Chris Dorman 

Oct 31, 2008

...and they're fit!

davejc7 

Oct 31, 2008

Even the Ginger one is !!!

CrackedLCD 

Oct 31, 2008

"still more consistent than any British indie album released this year"Is it? Well, if that's the case, can I ask why Glasvegas got 9/10 in this very magazine? If it's more consistant then any British indie album released in 2008, why have you given loads of 8/10s to British Indie albums released this year? Just a thought...

Soundedd 

Oct 31, 2008

Nadine Coyle - What a lovely woman

billytheshroom 

Nov 3, 2008

This one's going to get the 'but they don't play guitars!' huge indie band snobs ranting!

animal_machine 

Nov 3, 2008

is it possible to make a serious review about this?

Psycho_Mafia 

Nov 3, 2008

oh come on please. I dont care how good it is, its totally irrelevant to be reviewing a manufactured girl band in the NME, let alone telling us its "more consistent than any British indie album released this year" and fuck me, hey "its not their best" jesus, more to come i hope, so a Girls Aloud record could potentially be a 9 or 10 in NME??Its irrelevant. Totally. This is suppose to be the NME, not Smash Hits. Stop selling out, this payolla inititive is getting out of hand.I havnt been this angry since Ronson covered the Smiths. I read the Keane review in the NME (2/10) yet everywhere else it gets great reviews, now we get 8/10 for Girls Aloud?!?AM I MISSING SOMETHING HERE!!??Just wrong.

lex31 

Nov 3, 2008

it's not irrelevant to be reviewing a manufactured pop group in the NME if the music is good then it's good and if it warrants an 8 out of 10 review and the Kaiser Chiefs album warrants a 5 then that's fair enough. The only thing that pissed me off about Girls Aloud is when they made that song "Hoxton Heroes" as if they were credible enough to diss people that write thier own music.

Psycho_Mafia 

Nov 3, 2008

No sorry lex, you are wrong, from what i know NME is not the place for Girls Aloud. "If the music is good" you say??? well if its good music then should NME be reviewing good Jazz or Canto-pop music?! No. Need to draw a line at some point. Manufactured girl bands from pop idol is pretty much beyond the line for me. If you like it go and buy a 8 year olds pop music magazine. Im not having this shit. i want real musicians who earn their adulation through talent not payolla or telephone votes!!!!!

Soundedd 

Nov 3, 2008

lex31 is spot on. I listened to that Hoxton Heroes song and their having a pop at Indie bands for writing their own material. I want to see Cheryl Cole get a pen out and write a number one single!

Eastpaw 

Nov 3, 2008

"still more consistent than any British indie album released this year.", no way!

wellduhobviously 

Nov 4, 2008

Cheryl Tweedy > all.

bradpringle 

Nov 4, 2008

Good music is good music no matter where it comes from. Haven't heard the album so can't comment on it but NME usually reviews things in line with their genre, not necessarily lumping everything in together. Its the only way to review something by comparing it to it's peers. And yeah, it probably is more consistant than the mindless indie albums that get churned out these days. I think you're forgetting that indie is the new pop, only instead of putting the bands together they save money and time and just go sign anyone up that's playing the barfly this week.

cammy1875 

Nov 4, 2008

It's reviews like this that have made me stop buying the NME, ill be better buying Smash Hits to keep up with bands that actually posses some talent. How you can justify giving Fleet Foxes album a rating of 7 and then this buch of glorified karaoke singers a 8 is beyond me.

gravey 

Nov 4, 2008

8/10!?!?! Then their last album should have got 11/10, it was far superior. IMO Girls Aloud have really dropped the ball with 'Out of Control' - four albums in and it sounds like they're completely bored with it all. Just goes to show that NME simply doesn't possess an ear cultured enough to appreciate when mainstream pop is good or stale. I look forward to reading their take on the latest Take That effort.

theo28 

Nov 5, 2008

karaoke by dancing prostitutes. thats 8/10 jesus im losing faith in this country faster than a daily mail reader. lets get a fucking sense of perspective here. why is nme even reviewing this ? reverse edgy is so passe'

registeringsucks 

Nov 5, 2008

Wow, it's bad. No wait. It's worse. There are loads of top ten tracks in there. That's not bad..... if you're a member of Girls Aloud or a 14yr old girl. That's not good if you're Jaimie Hodgson. Why are you reviewing this tosh anyway? You need to give yourself a slap, immediately. Maybe with a run-up too. I can confirm to all the bemused jaw-gaping readers out there that the entire album is total gash cover to cover.NME’s indifferent approach to popular culture used to be a given. But recently there’s been an outbreak of ridiculous reviews striving only to be opposite of expectations. And having proceeded to listen to these albums regardless, I find myself bemused by the reviews. Where are you getting all these reviewers from anyway? There’s loads of ‘em. Random name generator? What qualifies a NME reviewer? I’m losing the faith.......

danshaggy292 

Nov 5, 2008

There's nothing wrong with pop music. Don't you know anything? The Beatles were a pop group. Abba were a pop group. And Girls Aloud are a fucking brilliant pop group. Admittedly, it's the Xenomania songwriting team that deserve a lot of the credit, but for those of you who are slating Girls Aloud just because they came from Popstars, or because they don't write the songs or play guitars, you're just wrong. It's the songs! Why do you think Franz Ferdinand worked with Xenomania? Or why Arctic Monkeys have covered them in the past?

lex31 

Nov 5, 2008

God there are some music snobs on here. I am a big fan of indie music but I'd rather listen to this than the terrible new Kaiser Chiefs record or Keane's new record or that boring overhyped Glasvegas band. And if that makes me uncool or commercial then I couldn't give a shit.

albumental 

Nov 5, 2008

Motown, Chess, Phil Spector. Each and everyone of these "Hit Makers" manufactured their artists. Wrote and produced their songs, told them what to wear etc etc. The argument that manufactured acts = bad is lazy and misinformed.

Soundedd 

Nov 5, 2008

The thing is though, "singing" and "songwriting" are too totally different skills. Girls Aloud like Leona Lewis, Leon Jackson, Shayne Ward etc etc won a "singing" contest. It doesn't mean that overnight their going to step into some machine and come out as good songwriter as John Lennon. I have no problem with Girls Aloud not writing their own tunes because let's face it they can't!, but when they critisize others that do it, thats just wrong, and personally I think their quite good actually but then I've always loved pop sounding music! :)

thebarebones 

Nov 6, 2008

Girls Aloud are brilliant. I have just ordered this album and I'm sure it will be almost as good as the others. To be honest all 4 albums have been amazing and some of the songwriting from Xenomania is miles better than what the indie scene has to offer right now.If you are a snob and don't think Girls Aloud are any good, try one of their albums and note the diversity of the songs, the clever chord changes and where the songs go. Songs like Biology are like 5 good pop song choruses all in one.I couldn't care less who sings, who writes the songs etc. Why worry about something like that when you can listen to great pop songs like this?BTW Cheryl can't sing!

six_str1nged 

Nov 6, 2008

Soundedd; singing and songwriting are TWO different skills. So is spelling. And judging by "overnight their going" (they're) and "critisize" (criticise) , it's a skill that you might want to practice. Bloody hell, I feel like a teacher, but every time I try to read nme.com, there you are; posting annoying things. Start a blog or something so that people can choose whether to listen to your incessant buzzing or not.Also, I wouldn't have a problem with NME pointing out that it's an enjoyable album, but to give it more than Fleet Foxes, as somebody already mentioned, should be illegal.

DeadShotKeen 

Nov 6, 2008

It's a perennial debate worth having. I think it's too easy to fall into either the hardline indie or "you're all snobs" hipster camps. I take a slightly more objective view, which is that I'm happy for NME (or anyone else) to review (and hence praise or dismiss) whatever they want. However, I'm suspicious that pretty much anything pop (beyond the resolutely naff ASDA fare that they might wish to entertainingly stick the boot into) always seems to garner high marks from NME and its ilk. You can just sense the reviewer's fear at being seen as curmudgeonly and bid for the relatively scarce reverse hip points. Having said that, my view there makes it pretty much impossible for me to think they can accurately objectify the thing. Maybe it is brilliant? Potentially my bad. Oh well. But yeah, "still more consistent than any British indie album released this year" - why does the reviewer feel the need to contextualise his opinion within indie? That's poor. A weasly half measure. Judge it on its own merits and within the context of its own genre or not at all, IMHO.

IndieWriter 

Nov 6, 2008

to everyone who's saying that this shouldnt be in nme, fuck off and buy something else

sheroman 

Nov 6, 2008

wait wait wait.......hold on a min.......did they jus call girls aloud...INDIE?????!!!!! wat da f**k !!!

albumental 

Nov 6, 2008

@DeadShotKeen. Ok so that's just about the most rational and intelligent opinion on music criticism I've read. Well done for knocking all our other comments into a cocked hat.

Soundedd 

Nov 6, 2008

Some people are so stuck up their own arse it's unbelievable (did I spell that right :) sixx_str1nged mate, do you think I give a monkeys about spelling really. I'm a 19 year old lad, I post on here to give myself and my mates a laugh, to think that men in their 30's or 40's like yourself haha, take it seriously is hilerious. By the way Fleet Foxes are absolute garbage, they just bore me so much it's unbelievable, i'd rather listen to Girls Aloud anyday. Also after Fleet Foxes go on Jools Holland tommorow night you'll all hate them as they'll have sold more than 50 records haha! awful awful band :)

registeringsucks 

Nov 7, 2008

How can someone have a valid opinion of an album without having listened to it first? I foolishly have listened to it with great interest after being astonished by the above score of 8/10 and can confirm with absolute certainty that it's every bit the utter shite one would have expected from these prefabricated karaoke stunners - just like all the cack they've done before, but I'm sure it'll be a great success within the popular culture market. If I were as smart thinking as AM I would cover one of their tracks too, in the hope it might land me some action...So this poses the real dilemma - who the fuck is Jamie Hodgson and what qualified him to review this album for NME? More importantly, if NME are now going to be basing their review scores taking into account a band’s respective genres and intended markets, this means we can no longer take any NME rating of 8/10 seriously, as it no longer has any relative context.Right then, I'm off to find a website that continues to cater for the Indie market. NME have gone Cosmo on our asses...

GayMessiah 

Nov 7, 2008

I really fucking hate snobbery of any kind, including music and here it is in abundance. Why shouldn't NME review Girls Aloud!? They are one of the best pop acts in the UK music industry today and quite rightly have acquired some credibility with some really great sounding electronic pop music... So what if they don't write their own material, when it comes down to it, I bet some of the indie bands that NME are supposed to be reviewing (according to some of these comments) don't write all their own songs either. Good music is good music and a decent song is a decent song - wherever it comes from; whether it be the artist or not! As for the album in question, it's not their best - in fact by their standards it's actually quite reserved and sombre at times, certainly not as dance orientated as previous efforts, but it's still a good album - i'd probably say 6 or 7/10 is closer to the mark.Whether you like Leonard Cohen or Scooter, what does it matter as long as the music moves or connects with you in some way - and putting NME down for recognising that readers

six_str1nged 

Nov 7, 2008

Good call mate, but unfortunately I'm 16. Thanks for the compliment though. I'm not going to try and convince you that Fleet Foxes are good, some people won't like them but to call them "boring" shows an unbelievable lack of a) actually listening to them or b) basic human emotion. I'm glad you are giving your mates a laugh though, do they not have anything else to do apart from read your inane comments for kicks?I also have no problem with Fleet Foxes becoming "popular". In case you didn't already notice, quite a lot of people have already bought their album. You may think I'm pretentious just because I like Fleet Foxes but it's actually just because they're good and every time anyone listens to "Oliver James" it sends a shiver down their back. And I don't have a problem with Girls Aloud at all.

cancelmysubscription 

Nov 7, 2008

no soundedd, you're just a tit

ape_dosmil 

Nov 7, 2008

I've never trusted the musical opinions of people who are unable to appreciate good pop music. A great song is a great song, manufactured or not. Motown Records' 60s and 70s output is case in point of manufactured pop music which remains a collection of some of the greatest songs ever recorded. The new Girls Aloud record is very good, well done NME. Keane and Snow Patrol might write their own songs, but who cares who wrote them when they're so utterly dull and forgettable?

Soundedd 

Nov 7, 2008

My apologies six_str1nged. In all fairness their just not my kind of element. I've heard the FF's album and despite the comments, I have some respect for them for being different, just not my cup of tea at all. I think if you want something other than the kind of pop based indie guitar music bands are popping out today, then I'd try The Last Shadow Puppets and Elbow. Two of my albums of the year. Anyway I'll be watching Jools tonight with an open mind so you never know. And yes I quite like Girls Aloud actually. Stairway To Heaven is my shiver down the back song ;)

MissMusic 

Nov 10, 2008

Not that i'm in to this band or anything, but they're live voices arn't all that bad unlike certain people... and they are pretty lasses. They have the likable factor. And I guess thats all that counts.. I meen.. if bloody Stairway to heaven can be a shiver down the back song (omg what the hell is the point in them lyrics.. p.s. nothing against the band) then Girls Aloud can get to the top of any chart...However "indie" ... no, not realy, in all three terms.. "independant music"... nope, the indie groups from the madchester/hacieda period... urm no... And even new indie (wich is quite random realy... its just like, hey heres a new band that sounds kinda depressing yet kinda good.. lets call it indie!)... i'm pretty sure that Girls Aloud don't quite come into that catagory niether.It's just a pop girl band that not just little 10yr old girls like..

Psycho_Mafia 

Nov 10, 2008

Pop music for the sake of pop music will always be pop music - Abba, Right Said Fred, S Club 7, Charles & Eddy, Girls Aloud et cetera. The Beatles and all the other 'credible' pop acts are only ‘pop’ because they were good enough to have crossed over to the mainstream from their alternative and/or original musical roots. Doesn’t make the ones who set out to make pop music for the sake of pop music original or credible, people should not be lumping Girls Aloud in the same category (or magazine!!) as the crossover indie acts who make pop music, like Keane, Snow Patrol, even the Kooks and all the others. Even though some of these bands make contrived pop rock n roll, they are still a million miles ahead of a group like Girls Aloud. It takes talent to write a pop song, but not if it is written for you for the sake of being a hit record. People are getting it twisted. It’s simply, this isn’t right nor credible and should not be in the NME (in my opinion anyway). Oh, and I have heard their monotonous hook laden unashamedly cringe-worthy new single, and if that’s

billytheshroom 

Nov 14, 2008

I quite like Girls Aloud - I think their tunes are pretty good. And that's all that matters at the end of the day - THE MUSIC. 'Can't sing live'??!?! Most indie bands can't sing live either.

Add your comment

NME Alerts

Get NME news delivered direct to your desktop. Find out more

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Register with MyNME

Every Tuesday and Friday

  • Up-to-the-minute news stories
  • The best new music and free downloads
  • Video interviews, photo galleries, competitions and more
  • Album and track reviews for the week ahead
  • Essential gigs in your area